The problem of «cinema and the audience» in the Russian cinema of the late 1980s.
- Annotation
- Authors
- List of references
The basic model adopted in 1989 for reforming the domestic film industry, developed in the bowels of the Union of Cinematographers of the USSR, turned out to be unviable in practice, since the real circumstances were not taken into account. In particular, no protectionist measures were envisaged that would allow domestic films to compete with foreign products. But the main reason that today Russian cinema makes up an insignificant part of the film repertoire in Russia lies in the insufficient attention of the initiators of the film reform to the problem of «cinema and the audience». The article examines the nature of the process of transferring the domestic film industry to market rails, begun 35 years ago, analyzes the reasons and consequences of this process, which determined the fate of the Lenfilm film studio
- Познин Виталий Федорович
- Chernykh V. ... and nothing but the truth. Sovietscreen. 1986. 5, Mar. 11 (in Russ.).
- Kosinova M. I. The first steps of reforming theorganizational and economic system of domestic cinematographyin the era of perestroika // Service Plus. 2020.Vol. 14. №. 3.
- The Fifth Congress of USSR Cinematographers //Art of Cinema. 1986. №. 10.P. 86.
- Zhabsky M. I. Socio-cultural drama of cinema: analyticalchronicle 1969–2005. M.: Canon +: Rehabilitation,2009. 774 (in Russ.).
- Vladilen Kuzin: «Documentary cinema is a fiction offreedom» // Art of cinema, 1990, № 2.
- «From Lenfilm they etched out, burned out amovie.» Interview with S. Snezhkin // https://regnum.ru/news/cultura/3357189.html
- SK-News, No. 6, 11.02.2000.
- Golutva A. A. It’s time to get used to it / The conversationwas conducted by N. Pakhomova // Session, 1991, № 4.122 Вестник СПбГИК № 3 (48) сентябрь · 2021
- Cit. according to the book by F. I. Razzakov «TheDeath of Soviet Cinema. Secrets of the behind-the-sceneswar 1973–1991». M.: Eksmo, 2008.
- The era of incompetents… So spoke aboutour time Alexey German, who is 75 // Nevskoe vremya,27.05.2021.
- Three years later. Answers to the IK questionnaire //Iskusstvo kino, 1989, № 5.
- Kokarev I. E. Russian cinema: between the pastand the future. M.: Russian Fountain of Culture, RussianPanorama, 2001.
- Golutva A. «If the producer does not burn out,then the director will not drown»: interview is conductedby Olga Sherwood. Art of cinema. 1991. 1, 48–50 (in Russ.).
- Melnikov V. V. Life. Movie. SPb.: BHV-Petersburg,2011. 363 (in Russ.).
- Dobrotvorsky S. Leningrad cinema: evolution ofthe author"s tradition. Saint-Petersburg «new cinema»: coll.of art. Saint-Petersburg, 1996. 34–46 (in Russ.).
- Tregubovich V. Self-financing should hit the target.Seans: site j. 2010. May 21.URL: https://seance.ru/articles/khozraschyot/ (accessed: June 13.2021) (in Russ.).
- Moskvina T. «Global cinema» of the Petrorad side:subjective notes about «Lenfilm-89». Art of cinema. 1990.7, 70–80 (in Russ.).
- The first interview. Why? Art of cinema. 1990. 6,3–8 (in Russ.).
- Sidorovsky L. «The era of mediocrity ...»: interviewwith director Alexei German. Nevskoe Vremya. 2013. May 27.URL: https://nvspb.ru/2013/07/23/epoha-bezdarey-51854(accessed: July 16.2021) (in Russ.).
- Dondurei D. B. New model of cinema: difficultiesof the transitional period. Film studies notes. 1989. 3, 3–14(in Russ.)
