научный журнал
вестник Санкт-Петербургского государственного
института культуры
RUS| ENG

Criteria for evaluating scientific activity and its results in library and information science

  • Annotation
  • Authors
  • List of references

The features of the assessment of scientific activity and its results in the library and information sphere are considered. Criteria for evaluating the significance of the activities of a scientist in the library and information sphere and his works by the number of publications using citation and Hirsch indices are highlighted. An attempt was made to identify the attitude of scientists involved in research in this area to the accepted criteria for evaluating the results of scientific activity. The results of an anonymous survey of scientists involved in research in the field of library science, bibliography and book science are presented, the purpose of which is to analyze the effectiveness of various areas of evaluation of scientific activity in the library and information sphere. In the developed questionnaire, quantitative and qualitative criteria for evaluating scientific activity are proposed. The results of the survey showed that the attitude to the evaluation criteria is largely related to the role of a scientist (researcher, head of a scientific department, etc.), as well as to the peculiarities of the development of the field of scientific research itself.

  • Захарчук Татьяна Викторовна
  • Бреслав Анастасия Евгеньевна
  • Zinovieva T. V. Evaluation of scientific work. Zinovieva T. V. Basic sociological terms: tutorial. Chelyabinsk: Publ. house of URGU, 2006. URL: https:// voluntary.ru/termin/ocenka-nauchnogo-truda.html (accessed: Nov.12.2022) (in Russ.).
  • Ignatiev A. A. Evaluation of scientific work. Russian sociological encyclopedia / ed. G. V. Osipova. Moscow: NORMA-INFRA M, 1998. 369–370 (in Russ.).
  • Grinev A. V. The use of scientometric indicators in evaluating publication activity in modern Russia. Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2019. 89 (10), 993–1002 (in Russ.).
  • Kirchanov M. V. Quantitative and qualitative methods of accounting for the effectiveness of research work. Bulletin of the Voronezh State University. Ser. Problems of higher education. 2018. 1, 71–75 (in Russ.).
  • Zakharchuk T. V. Evaluation of scientific work in the library and information sphere. Scientific and technical libraries. 2017. 8, 18–26 (in Russ.).
  • Pankratova A. V. Comparative analysis of the nature of author"s thanks in monographic studies of various fields of science. Problems of the activities of scientists and scientific teams: intern. yearbook / ed. S. A. Kugel. Saint-Petersburg: Publ. house of SaintPetersburg State Technical University, 2001. 16 (2), 155–159 (in Russ.).
  • Zusman O. M. Methods for identifying the modern scientific elite in Saint-Petersburg. Intellectual elite of St. Petersburg. Saint-Petersburg: Publ. house of Saint-Petersburg State Univ. of Economics, 1993. 28–37 (in Russ.).
Authors: Zakharchuk Tat’yana Viktorovna
Breslav Anastasia Evgenievna
Рубрика: Документальная информация
Pages: 150-155
УДК: 02:004]:001.89
DOI: 10.30725/2619-0303-2023-1-150-155
Keywords: library and information science, research activity, scientific work, criteria for evaluating scientific activity, publication activity, scientific reputation, citation index, Hirsch index, categories of scientific journals, acknowledgments in scientific works
График выхода номеров
№1
март

1 декабря - заканчивается прием работ

25 февраля - сдача номера в печать

Выход в свет - март

№2
июнь

1 марта - заканчивается прием работ

25 мая - сдача номера в печать

Выход в свет - июнь

№3
сентябрь

1 июня - заканчивается прием работ

25 августа - сдача номера в печать

Выход в свет - сентябрь

№4
декабрь

1 сентября - заканчивается прием работ

25 ноября - сдача номера в печать

Выход в свет - декабрь