The virtual dimension of the heritage site and its representation in the digital age
- Annotation
- Authors
- List of references
The process of transformation of communicative practices of interpretation and popularization of cultural heritage in
the framework of the accelerating dissemination and integration of digital technologies in all spheres of human activity is
considered. The rhizomorphism of modern digital culture is analyzed, which inevitably affects the nature of the representation
of monuments in virtual space. It is hypothesized that, despite the variety of approaches presented for creating digital avatars
of cultural institutions and cultural heritage objects in a virtual environment, none of the currently existing solutions for Saint
Petersburg makes it possible to represent a cultural heritage object in the context of its retrospective visualization and connection
with other culturally significant objects, such as events and personalities. Conceptual grounds are proposed for a deeper
understanding of the cultural monument as a subject of representation. An attempt is made to comprehend the representative
capabilities of digital instruments, moreover, the question of the need to develop a full-scale and multi-functional digital platform
for representing cultural heritage sites is raised.
- Пучковская Антонина Алексеевна
- Максимова Лада Вячеславовна
- 1. McLuhan М. Understanding media: the extensions ofman. Мoscow: Kuchkovo pole, 2014. 464 (in Russ.).2. Deleuze G., Guattari F. A Thousand plateaus. Capitalismand schizophrenia. Мoscow, 2010. 672 (in Russ.).3. Manovich L. The language of new media. Cambridge:MIT Press, 2001. 354.4. Toffler A. The third wave. Мoscow: АSТ, 2010. 784 (in Russ.).5. Geismar H. Museum object lessons for the digital age.London: UCL Press, 2018. 164.6. Zhang J., Mauney D. When archival description meetsdigital object metadata: a typological study of digital archivalrepresentation. The American archivist. 2013. 76 (1), 174–195.7. Marchese F. T. Conserving digital art for deep time.Leonardo. 2011. 44 (4), 302–308.8. Povroznik N. Virtual museum: conservation andrepresentation of cultural heritage. Vestnik of Perm University.2015. 4 (31), 213–221 (in Russ.).9. Beaulieu A., de Rijcke S. Museums in a Digital Culture.Amsterdam: Amsterdam Univ. Press, 2016. 146.10. Gvazava V. Virtual Museum in University Education.The world of the Russian word. 2014. 3, 99–102 (in Russ.).11. Vyatkina Yu. D. Virtual museum as a PR-tool. Man inthe world of culture. 2012. 4, 54–58 (in Russ.).12. Collections online 2.0. KAMIS. Museum systems. URL:https://kamis.ru/veb-resheniya/kollektsii-on-layn/ (accessed:May 30.2020) (in Russ.).13. Centofanti M., Brusaporci S. Interpretative 3D digitalmodels in architectural surveying of historical buildings.Computational modelling of objects represented in images III:fundamentals, methods and applications. London: CRC Press,2012. 433–438.14. Borodkin L. I. Virtual reconstruction of Moscowmonasteries: projects in the context of digital humanities. Bulletinof Perm University. Ser. History. 2014. 3 (26), 107–112 (in Russ.).15. Ippolito A. Handbook of research on emergingtechnologies for digital preservation and informationmodeling. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2016. 256–287.16. Nikonova А. A. Visual technologies and preservationof cultural heritage in Russia. Bulletin of Saint-Petersburg StateUniversity of Culture and Arts. 2014. 1 (18), 49–53 (in Russ.).17. On the approval of the form of the passport of thecultural heritage object: order of the Russ. protection ofculture from Feb. 27. 2010 № 27: registered with the Ministryof Justice of Russia on Apr. 15. 2010. Culture: management,economics, law. 2010. 3, 31–40 (in Russ.).18. Kimeeva T. I. Methodology for attribution of museumitems and the possibility of intra-museum broadcasting of itsresults. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University of Culture and Arts.2019. 48, 134–142 (in Russ.).19. Pearce S. M. Thinking about things. Museums journal.1986. 85 (4), 198–201.20. Dyachkov A. N. Monument in the system of theobjective world of culture. Monument in the system of theobjective world of culture: questions of the development ofhistorical and cultural heritage: coll. of sci. art. Moscow:Research Inst. of Culture, 1987. 41–60 (in Russ.).21. Smith L. Uses of heritage. London: Routledge, 2006. 369.22. Bourdieu P. Practical meaning. Saint-Petersburg:Aleteya, 2001. 562 (in Russ.).23. Suvorov N. Suvorov Cultural monument as imaginaryof reality. Bulletin of Saint-Petersburg State University of Cultureand Arts. 2017. 4 (33), 76–80 (in Russ.).24. Molodkina L. V. To the question of phenomenologyof memory (based on the example of architectural and naturalmemorial). Bulletin of Saint-Petersburg State University. Ser. 7.Philosophy. 2007. 6, 88–97 (in Russ.).25. CityWalls: architectural web-site of Saint Petersburg.URL: https://www.citywalls.ru/ (accessed: May 30.2020) (inRuss.).26. Visit Petersburg. URL: http://www.visit-petersburg.ru/ (accessed: May 30.2020) (in Russ.).
