Reader criticism on the Internet: problems and controversies
- Annotation
- Authors
- List of references
The features of reading communities and the psychology of reading on the Internet are considered, including the phenomenon of literary fanaticism, the «popular» recommendation of books, the relationship between readers and writers, the advantages and disadvantages of reader criticism. The reasons for the confrontation between reader and literary criticism, as well as the reasons that led to the crisis of professional literature examination are analyzed. It is concluded that overcoming the crisis of reading in Russia depends more on the further self-organization of readers on the Internet than on government campaigns to support reading. At the same time, the importance of analyzing reader feedback is emphasized in order to recreate an accurate and complete picture of reading in the country and to study the peculiarities of readers’ perception of various books and literary genres.
- Матвеев Михаил Юрьевич
- Askarova V. Ya. So, do we have a chance to create a reading nation? Librarianship. 2010. 24, 4–11 (in Russ.).
- Gerasimova A. V. About one specific practice: reviews of books on the Internet. Public opinion monitoring: economic and social changes. 2018. 1, 222–234 (in Russ.).
- Samokhina M. M., Kondratyeva O. N. Reader communication of young people on the Internet. University book. 2011. 9, 32–33 (in Russ.).
- Samokhina M. M., Kondratieva O. N. Young readers on the Internet: : according to the results of sociological research. Librarianship. 2011. 14, 39–42 (in Russ.).
- Secrets S. Again, this critic did not understand anything! On Writers’ Fans and Critics’ Criticism. Independent Newspaper. 2017. June 15. URL: https:// www.ng.ru/lit/2017-06-15/14_890_kritik.html?id_user=Y (accessed: Sept. 14.2022) (in Russ.).
- Kovtun E. N. Fiction as an object of scientific research: problems and prospects of domestic science fiction. Russian fantasy at the crossroads of eras and cultures: materials of the Intern. sci. conf. Mar. 21–23, 2006. Moscow, 2007. 20–38 (in Russ.).
- Samokhina M. M. Young readers on the Internet (observations of a sociologist). New Literary Review. 2010. 102, 300–307 (in Russ.).
- Samokhina M. M. Reading youth: what happened in half a century (figures, facts, memories and reflections). New literary review. 2022. 5 (177), 386–400 (in Russ.).
- Belyaeva N. E. Reading fiction on the Internet: the study of modern reader practices of Internet reading. Bulletin of culture and arts. Orel, 2017. 2 (50), 47–52 (in Russ.).
- Ivanova E. V. Do not read: who is to blame and what to do? Russian Library Association Newsletter. 2008. 49, 18–21 (in Russ.).
- Ovsyannikova A. A., Malafeeva Ya. V., Zamiralova T. A. Reader activity in thematic social networks. (comp.). Modern reader in the mirror of research projects of public libraries: coll. research materials / comp. L. V. Glukhova, A. G. Makarova, A. S. Stepanova. SaintPetersburg, 2018. 101–109 (in Russ.).
- Gerasimova A. V. About one specific practice: reviews of books on the Internet. Public opinion monitoring: economic and social changes. 2018. 1, 222–234 (in Russ.).
- Reitblat A. I. Russian edition of mass literature: an unread page. New Literary Review. 2006. 77, 405–412 (in Russ.).
- Gudkov L. D. Mass literature as a problem. For whom? New Literary Review. 1996. 22, 79–82 (in Russ.).
- Zorkaya N. Reading in the context of mass communications. Public Opinion Monitoring. 2003. 2 (64), 60–70 (in Russ.).
- Chernyak M. A. The phenomenon of mass literature of the twentieth century: problems of genesis and poetics: dis. on competition of sci. degree PhD in philology. St. Petersburg, 2005. 486 (in Russ.).
- Samorukov I. I. Mass literature: the problem of artistic reflection: dis. on competition of sci. degree PhD in philology. Samara, 2006. 198 (in Russ.).
- Kornev S. «Network literature» and the completion of postmodernity: the Internet as a habitat for literature. New Literary Review. 1998. 32, 29–47 (in Russ.).
- Guseva L. N. The experience of professional reading. Librarianship. 2006. 12, 30–33 (in Russ.).
- Heidegger M. Time and Being: art. and speeches. Moscow: Respublika, 1993. 445, [2] (in Russ.).
- Skitnevsky V. O. Eternal companion of spirit and mind. Librarianship. 2006. 7, 32–35 (in Russ.).
- Frolova A. S., Uvarova S. A. Literary blogger as a legislator of reader fashion among urban students. Science notes of Altai State academy of culture and arts. 2001. 1 (27), 64–71 (in Russ.).
- Matlina S. G. Once again about love ... for reading. Review of recent conferences on problems of reading. Librarianship. 2018. 3, 37–42 (in Russ.).
- Bulkina I. Kritika.ru. «Triumph of overtones». Flag. 2016. 12, 196–200 (in Russ.).
- Shcherbinina Yu. V. The search for a horse (on the examination of literary creativity). Flag. 2014. 12, 182–191 (in Russ.).
- Lebedev I. V. Genre poetics in Russian fantasy of the late XX – early XIX centuries: dis. on competition of sci. degree PhD in philology. Moscow, 2016. 162 (in Russ.).
- Ivanova N et al., Ivanitskaya E. (survey idea, comp. and foreword). Literary criticism: the rights of imposture or the rightness of expertise. Textura: thick lit. portal. 2018. Jan 6. URL: https://textura.club/author/wpadm/ (accessed: Sept. 14.2022) (in Russ.).
- Yuzefovich G. What catches the fantasy of a qualified reader. Librarianship. 2021. 15, 4–8 (in Russ.).
