Scholarly monograph: dynamics of citation and reader’s demand
- Annotation
- Authors
- List of references
The purpose of the paper: the determination the main features of the development of the scholarly monograph based on the analysis of the documentary array of domestic monographs presented in the resources elibrary.ru in recent years — from 2010 to 2021 inclusive: how its circulation, volume, system of preparation and publication changes, how the dynamics of its citation changes during this period, how its industry specialization affects this process. Over the 12 years of study (from 2010 to 2021), some specifications have changed in a scholarly monograph, for example, volume, circulation, preparation system and publishing origin. In terms of content, scholarly monographs are more related to the social and humanitarian complex of sciences. The same sections have the highest citation rates. The active transfer of monographs to electronic collections of large aggregations that develop modern ways of accessing and using content contributes significantly to the increase in the citation and use of scholarly monographs. The volume of reader demand in the SPSTL SB RAS for the cited titles exceeds twice the volume of citations. There is a connection between citation and the demand for titles: a greater demand for books in the library provides a greater number of citations and this should be considered and used when solving issues of primary and secondary selection in the library collections and in the system of preservation of publications.
- Подкорытова Наталья Ивановна
- Куулар Марта Чечен-ооловна
- Semenov E. V. Production of indicators as a mechanism for suppressing the production of knowledge, technologies and competencies. Science Management: Theory and Practice. 2020. 2 (1), 69–93 (in Russ.).
- Guba K. S. Publish or Perish, or Debunking meritocracy in science. Issues of education. 2011. 3 (Oct.), 210–225 (in Russ.).
- Molini A., Bodenhausen D. Bibliometrics as a weapon of mass citation. Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2017. 87 (1), 70–77 (in Russ.).
- Zuccala A., Guns R., Cornacchia R., Bod R. Can we rank scholarly book publishers? A bibliometric experiment with the field of history. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (JASIST). 2015. 66 (7), 1333–1347 (in Russ.).
- Chunlin J., Qingxiao W. Construction of influence evaluation indicators system embodied altmetrics of academic monographs in humanities and social sciences. Journal of Intelligence. 2018. 12, 65–71, 77.
- Cordón-García J.-A., Merchán-Sánchez-Jara J., Mangas-Vega A. Evolution of the visibility of scholarly monographs in the academic field. Profesional De La información. 2019. 28 (4): Uso de información académica. URL: https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_ op=view_citation&hl=en&user=pULlm40AAAAJ&citati on_for_view=pULlm40AAAAJ:7PzlFSSx8tAC (accessed: Nov. 04.2023).
- Kalashnikova G. V. Bibliometric tools in the structure of information support for scientific activities of the region: dis. on competition of sci. degree PhD in pedagogy / Moscow State Inst. of Culture. Moscow, 2021. 202 (in Russ.).
- Mokhnacheva Yu. V., Tsvetkova V. A. The role of documents of several types and their influence on the world and Russian publication arrays (according to WoS CC and Scopus). Scientific and technical libraries. 2022. 8, 37–59 (in Russ.).
- Glushanovsky A. V., Tsvetkova V. A., Tyutyunnik V. M. Features of the flow of Russian publications in certain scientific areas. Instruments and systems. Management, control, diagnostics. 2021. 8, 31–37 (in Russ.).
- Book market in Russia: state, trends and development prospects: industry report / Min. of Digital Development, Communications and Mass Communications of the Russ. Federation. Moscow, 2021. 94 (in Russ.).
